This forum is read-only now. Please use Forum 2 for new posts

xml No replies possible in the archive
EL cases - discussion topic
Author: mauro77
Date: 08-11-2009, 08:41
Edited by: mauro77
at: 08-11-2009, 08:49
I have some doubts about this case as there can be an alternative solution but I don't know which preference UEFA does choose?

a) As least switches as possible or
b) As least early qualification games as possible

Case 6 from EL cases - (Top 3 coun.) CL TH qual. for EL Q3:

https://kassiesa.net/uefa//forum/view.php?topic=20091108082901.xml

You must not forward 8 !!! teams from Q1 into Q2 but it is enough to forward 6 teams, see this alternative path:

Q1:
50 teams
- 6 teams into Q2
--------------------
44 teams

Q2:
55 teams
- 3 teams into Q3
+ 6 teams from Q1
+ 22 winners from Q1
--------------------
80 teams

Q3:
30 teams
- 1 CL TH into CL
- 2 teams into Q4
+ 3 teams from Q2
+ 40 winners from Q2
--------------------
70 teams

Q4:
39 teams
+ 2 teams from Q3
+ 35 winners from Q3
--------------------
76 teams

GP:
10 teams
38 winners from Q4
--------------------
48 teams

As you cann see the result is the same but I have notice in the past that UEFA has make his switches allways even wise, 1 (exception), 2 or 4 teams but never 3 teams as it would be case here in Q3/Q4.

What do you think, which way is the right one?