|
This forum is read-only now. Please use Forum 2 for new posts
xml |
No replies possible in the archive |
Author: nitsansh
Date: 09-10-2005, 06:26
Edited by: nitsansh at: 09-10-2005, 07:27 | Standings after matches of Oct 8: Association '06 Points Matches Coeff. total 1 Greece 1,636 36 19 1,895 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 Netherlands 2,818 50 19 2,632 3 England 2,444 42 17 2,471 4 Portugal 2,455 27 11 2,455 5 Czech Republic 2,182 46 19 2,421 6 France 1,889 41 17 2,412 7 Croatia 2,556 39 17 2,294 ------------------------------------------------------------ 8 Germany 0,000 18 8 2,250 9 Sweden 2,333 38 17 2,235 10 Poland 2,667 37 17 2,176 11 Italy 2,222 37 17 2,176 12 Turkey 1,818 39 19 2,053 13 Spain 1,889 34 17 2,000 14 Romania 2,083 39 20 1,950 ------------------------------------------------------------ 15 Russia 2,000 36 19 1,895 16 Serbia & Mont. 2,111 31 17 1,824 17 Bulgaria 1,556 31 17 1,824 18 Denmark 1,727 34 19 1,789 19 Ukraine 2,083 35 20 1,750 20 Bosnia-Herz. 1,778 29 17 1,706 21 Norway 1,667 29 17 1,706 ------------------------------------------------------------ 22 Slovakia 2,000 32 19 1,684 23 Latvia 1,364 31 19 1,632 24 Ireland 1,778 27 17 1,588 25 Belgium 1,222 27 17 1,588 26 Slovenia 1,333 26 17 1,529 27 Israel 1,800 27 18 1,500 28 Hungary 1,444 24 17 1,412 ------------------------------------------------------------ 29 Scotland 1,111 24 17 1,412 30 Finland 1,455 26 19 1,368 31 Estonia 1,273 22 19 1,158 32 Lithuania 1,000 19 17 1,118 33 Albania 1,182 21 19 1,105 34 Wales 0,556 18 17 1,059 35 Iceland 0,444 17 17 1,000 ------------------------------------------------------------ 36 Georgia 0,909 17 19 0,895 37 Belarus 1,111 13 17 0,765 38 Macedonia 0,727 14 19 0,737 39 North. Ireland 1,000 12 17 0,706 40 Cyprus 0,444 12 17 0,706 41 Moldova 0,556 11 17 0,647 42 Armenia 0,364 11 19 0,579 ------------------------------------------------------------ 43 Liechtenstein 0,667 9 20 0,450 44 Azerbaijan 0,333 7 17 0,412 45 Andorra 0,455 5 19 0,263 46 Malta 0,222 3 17 0,176 47 Faroe Islands 0,111 2 18 0,111 48 Kazakhstan 0,091 1 11 0,091 49 San Marino 0,000 0 17 0,000 50 Luxembourg 0,000 0 19 0,000 |
Author: nitsansh
Date: 09-10-2005, 07:26
Edited by: nitsansh at: 09-10-2005, 07:30 | GRE (TH), NED, ENG, POR & CZE are secured in pot 1. FRA need a draw vs CYP and will surely get it. CRO need to win against HUN. SWE need a win against ISL and either FRA lose or CRO lose or draw. GER get to pot 1 if CRO and SWE don't win.
POL and ITA are secured in pot 2. TUR and ESP need a draw to stay in pot 2. If RUS wins they will be level with ROM, and GD could decide who is in pot 2, but if ESP or TUR lose they both will be in pot 2. SCG can get to put 2 with win over BIH and ESP lose and RUS don't win.
RUS and UKR are secured in pot 3. SCG, BUL and DEN need a draw to stay in pot 3. BIH and NOR should win to be sure in pot 3.
SVK, LAT, IRL, BEL and SLO can move up to pot 3.
SCO and FIN can move up to pot 4, at the expense of SLO or HUN.
GEO can go up to pot 5 instead of WAL or ISL.
AZE can replace ARM in pot 6. |
Author: Magnus
Date: 09-10-2005, 07:50
| nitsansh, sorry for my bad English ( I am from Russia). I do not understand, who will in 2 pot, if Esp, Tur and Russia wins ? -- For example: Espana wins, Turkey wins and Slovakia - Russia 0-1( for example). So: 12.Turkey 13.Espana 14-15. Romania - 2,083 - 39 - 20 - 1,950 14-15. Russia - 2,083 - 39 - 20 - 1,950 ----------------------------- Romania or Russia in that case? P.S. Sorry for my English, please. |
Author: Magnus
Date: 09-10-2005, 08:00
| What is "GD" ? |
Author: Edgar
Date: 09-10-2005, 08:14
Edited by: Edgar at: 09-10-2005, 08:23 | GD = Goal Difference
At the moment:
Romania
20 games - 39 points. 1.95 coeff GF (goals for): 41 GA (goals against): 19 GD (goal difference): 22
Russia
19 games - 36 points 1.895 coeff GF: 42 GA: 24 GD: 18
If Spain and Turkey both win, Russia must win by at least 4 goals in Bratislava in order to beat Romania for a place in the 2nd pot.
So - 12 October
San Marino - Spain Albania - Turkey Slovakia - Russia
I think we can safely assume Spain will win in San Marino. This means they will be in the second pot. The last 2nd pot place is between Turkey, Romania and Russia.
If Turkey doesn't lose in Tirana, Russia needs to win by at least 4 goals in Bratislava in order to beat Romania for a place in the 2nd pot.
If Albania beats Turkey, then Russia only needs to win against Slovakia. |
Author: Magnus
Date: 09-10-2005, 09:37
| Edgar,thank you for explanation. Oh, victory of Albania in a game with Turkey is science fiction( Russia is in a 3rd pot. |
Author: nightfire
Date: 09-10-2005, 20:12
| Is it definite that there will be only 7 groups with the top 2 going through from each group? |
Author: peter
Date: 09-10-2005, 20:53
| @nightfire: that's for sure ! |
Author: peter
Date: 09-10-2005, 20:56
Edited by: peter at: 09-10-2005, 23:14 | Yeah , very intresting the finish of actual preliminations.My prediction is, -Sweden is more likely to go in the pot 1, then pot1 is sealed.
-i guess pot 2 is sealed too, of course many calculations can be done but for real its unlikely to beileve that turkey will lose in albania or rusia will beat in slovakia with 4 goals difference. Turkey doing many mistakes but i dont think they will do this one.
- its very intresting to see pot 3, very strong team comes togheter from below If you look , except italy and spain, there is no difference between pot 2 and 3, they all level good teams . |
Author: anita
Date: 10-10-2005, 15:37
Edited by: anita at: 10-10-2005, 16:16 | It seems that Norways match against Belarus is important after all. If Norway lose, they will end up on 1,611 points, the same as Ireland and Belgium if those teams win. What are the rules then, FIFA-ranking, or? Slovakia will end up on 1,7 if they beat Russia.
If Norway draw against Belarus, they will have 1,666, so they better win!! Looking at the countries, Pot 3 is more than slightly better than pot 4, IMO.
Edit: Hmmm. Sorry, I counted with 2 points for win. It is of course 3 points for win, which means that Ireland, Slovakia, Latvia and Belgium may pass Norway on ranking if Norway lose to Belarus. If Norway get one point, and Ireland and Belgium win, all three will end up on 1,666. Again, what then? |
Author: Edgar
Date: 10-10-2005, 16:50
| If two or more associations have the same coefficient, the following criteria will be applied:
a) coefficient from the matches played in its most recent qualifying competition, b) average goal difference, c) average number of goals scored, d) average number of away goals scored, e) drawing of lots. |
Author: Giuseppe
Date: 10-10-2005, 17:43
| So am I to understand that unless Russia beat Sloavakia by 4 goals (which is highly unlikely) Romania will be second-seed for the Euro 2008 campiagn? |
Author: Edgar
Date: 10-10-2005, 18:16
| Indeed, Romania is 99,9% in the 2nd pot. Read this (link) - Romanian only. |
Author: dinamozagreb
Date: 10-10-2005, 19:52
| Cmon Croatia....
We are all drunk But have to win to be in pot 1.
Pot 2 is not bad although. |
Author: forbsey
Date: 10-10-2005, 20:13
| What needs to happen on Wednesday for Scotland to make pot 4? Would a win against Slovenia be enough or do we need Hungary to lose as well? |
Author: thomas
Date: 10-10-2005, 20:18
| What about the last 8 teams? Will they be in one pot and one group will get 2 of this pot or will there a final pot with only the worst team, that is for sure in the 8-team-group? |
Author: Edgar
Date: 10-10-2005, 21:10
| @forbsey
A win against Slovenia will be enough. |
Author: Maluyaca
Date: 12-10-2005, 20:39
| do play off matches count too? |
Author: anita
Date: 12-10-2005, 20:43
| No |
Author: Maluyaca
Date: 12-10-2005, 20:51
| Thanks Anita, so tonight we know it. |
Author: anita
Date: 12-10-2005, 20:56
| That would have been the utter insult by FIFA against lower ranked teams (of the six play-off teams), as long as they have ANOTHER and NEW seeding in the play-off matches. |
Author: anita
Date: 12-10-2005, 21:54
| If Scotland draw against Slovenia, Hungary and Scotland will end up on same coeff, but Hungary will be seeded in pot 4 and Scotland pot 5 because Hungary have more points in their group. So Scotland have to win tonite to get into pot 4. |
Author: anita
Date: 12-10-2005, 22:01
| Sweden safe in pot 1 and Croatia down to pot 2 after tonites results. So Germany and Italy (and Spain) will stay in pot 2, as far as I can see. |
Author: nightfire
Date: 12-10-2005, 22:41
| and the Scots do it convincingly |
Author: flob
Date: 12-10-2005, 23:12
| Final standings: Assoziation '06 pts pld cff
1 Greece 1,750 39 20 1,950 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 Netherlands 2,667 51 20 2,550 3 England 2,500 45 18 2,500 4 Portugal 2,500 30 12 2,500 5 Czech Republic 2,250 49 20 2,450 6 France 2,000 44 18 2,444 7 Sweden 2,400 41 18 2,278 ------------------------------------------------------------ 8 Germany 0,000 18 8 2,250 9 Croatia 2,400 40 18 2,222 10 Italy 2,300 40 18 2,222 11 Turkey 1,917 42 20 2,100 12 Poland 2,400 37 18 2,056 13 Spain 2,000 37 18 2,056 14 Romania 2,083 39 20 1,950 ------------------------------------------------------------ 15 Serbia & Mont. 2,200 34 18 1,889 16 Russia 1,917 37 20 1,850 17 Denmark 1,833 37 20 1,850 18 Norway 1,800 32 18 1,778 19 Bulgaria 1,500 32 18 1,778 20 Ukraine 2,083 35 20 1,750 21 Slovakia 1,917 33 20 1,650 ------------------------------------------------------------ 22 Bosnia-Herz. 1,600 29 18 1,611 23 Ireland 1,700 28 18 1,556 24 Belgium 1,200 28 18 1,556 25 Latvia 1,250 31 20 1,550 26 Israel 1,800 27 18 1,500 27 Scotland 1,300 27 18 1,500 28 Slovenia 1,200 26 18 1,444 ------------------------------------------------------------ 29 Hungary 1,400 25 18 1,389 30 Finland 1,333 26 20 1,300 31 Estonia 1,417 25 20 1,250 32 Wales 0,800 21 18 1,167 33 Lithuania 1,000 20 18 1,111 34 Albania 1,083 21 20 1,050 35 Iceland 0,400 17 18 0,944 ------------------------------------------------------------ 36 Georgia 0,833 17 20 0,850 37 Macedonia 0,750 15 20 0,750 38 Belarus 1,000 13 18 0,722 39 Armenia 0,583 14 20 0,700 40 North. Ireland 0,900 12 18 0,667 41 Cyprus 0,400 12 18 0,667 42 Moldova 0,500 11 18 0,611 ------------------------------------------------------------ 43 Liechtenstein 0,667 9 20 0,450 44 Azerbaijan 0,300 7 18 0,389 45 Andorra 0,417 5 20 0,250 46 Malta 0,300 4 18 0,222 47 Faroe Islands 0,100 2 18 0,111 48 Kazakhstan 0,083 1 12 0,083 49 San Marino 0,000 0 18 0,000 50 Luxembourg 0,000 0 20 0,000 Greetings Flob |
Author: Maluyaca
Date: 12-10-2005, 23:13
Edited by: Maluyaca at: 12-10-2005, 23:14 | Slovakia and Bosnia change pot.
After edit the reply before me wasn't there so forget this |
Author: Sanibel
Date: 12-10-2005, 23:15
| Where and when is the draw? |
Author: christoph2136
Date: 12-10-2005, 23:19
| Jan 27th, 2006, in Montreux, as far as I know. |
Author: Maluyaca
Date: 12-10-2005, 23:54
Edited by: Maluyaca at: 12-10-2005, 23:56 | Montreux in Switserland |
Author: nitsansh
Date: 13-10-2005, 01:32
| Is my ranking the same as yours???
Standings after matches of Oct 12: Association '06 Points Matches Coeff. total 14 Greece 1,750 39 20 1,950 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 Netherlands 2,667 51 20 2,550 2 England 2,500 45 18 2,500 2 Portugal 2,500 30 12 2,500 4 Czech Republic 2,250 49 20 2,450 5 France 2,000 44 18 2,445 6 Sweden 2,400 41 18 2,278 ------------------------------------------------------------ 7 Germany 0,000 18 8 2,250 8 Croatia 2,400 40 18 2,222 9 Italy 2,300 40 18 2,222 10 Turkey 1,917 42 20 2,100 11 Poland 2,400 37 18 2,176 12 Spain 2,000 37 18 2,056 13 Romania 2,083 39 20 1,950 ------------------------------------------------------------ 15 Serbia & Mont. 2,200 34 18 1,889 16 Russia 1,917 37 20 1,850 17 Denmark 1,833 37 20 1,850 18 Norway 1,800 32 18 1,778 19 Bulgaria 1,500 32 18 1,778 20 Ukraine 2,083 35 20 1,750 21 Slovakia 1,917 33 20 1,750 ------------------------------------------------------------ 22 Bosnia-Herz. 1,600 29 18 1,611 23 Ireland 1,700 28 18 1,556 24 Belgium 1,200 28 18 1,556 25 Latvia 1,250 31 20 1,550 26 Israel 1,800 27 18 1,500 27 Scotland 1,300 27 18 1,500 28 Slovenia 1,200 26 18 1,445 ------------------------------------------------------------ 29 Hungary 1,400 25 18 1,412 30 Finland 1,333 26 20 1,389 31 Estonia 1,417 25 20 1,250 32 Wales 0,800 21 18 1,167 33 Lithuania 1,000 20 18 1,111 34 Albania 1,083 21 20 1,050 35 Iceland 0,400 17 18 0,945 ------------------------------------------------------------ 36 Georgia 0,833 17 20 0,850 37 Macedonia 0,750 15 20 0,750 38 Armenia 0,583 14 20 0,700 39 Belarus 1,000 13 18 0,722 40 North. Ireland 0,900 12 18 0,667 41 Cyprus 0,400 12 18 0,667 42 Moldova 0,500 11 18 0,611 ------------------------------------------------------------ 43 Liechtenstein 0,667 9 20 0,450 44 Azerbaijan 0,300 7 18 0,389 45 Andorra 0,417 5 20 0,250 46 Malta 0,300 4 18 0,222 47 Faroe Islands 0,111 2 18 0,111 48 Kazakhstan 0,083 1 12 0,083 49 San Marino 0,000 0 18 0,000 49 Luxembourg 0,000 0 20 0,000 |
Author: nitsansh
Date: 13-10-2005, 01:57
| I'm curious where Switzerland and Austria would have been ranked if they didn't qualify as hosts... can anyone do a quick calculation?
I'm also interested to see the moves in the standing from the ranking 2 years ago... and perhaps further back... where can I find those old ranking lists?
Surely Serbia, Ukraine and Slovakia are among the teams that moved up... Belgium took a deep dive... Spain probably dropped a few spots... Slovenia also went down... In the lower half, I guess Estonia, Albania, Belarus, Liechtenstein and Andorra moved up a few places... On the other hand I would expect to see Iceland and Cyprus dropping down... |
Author: anita
Date: 13-10-2005, 03:46
| nitsansh, Austria had 9 points in 8 matches in ECQ-04, = 1.125. Switzerland 15/8 = 1.875 |
Author: alono
Date: 13-10-2005, 06:54
Edited by: alono at: 13-10-2005, 06:57 | To nitsansh and anita: Counting both Euro 2004 and World Cup 2006... Switzerland = 33/18 = 1.8333 --> 3rd pot Austria = 24/18 = 1.3333 --> 5th pot |
Author: Edgar
Date: 13-10-2005, 08:49
Edited by: Edgar at: 13-10-2005, 09:04 | To flob & nitsansh:
You both have Luxembourg last. I have San Marino last. Both have 0 points.
It comes down to GD:
San Marino 2 - 70 -> -68 in 18 games = -3.7778 Luxembourg 5 - 69 -> -64 in 20 games = -3.2
Am I right? |
Author: flob
Date: 13-10-2005, 09:21
| Edgar, you are right. My apologise to all fans from Luxembourg.
nitsansh, here is the ranking from 2004: Ass. pld pts cff 1 France 8 24 3,000 2 Portugal 10 24 2,400 3 Sweden 18 43 2,388 4 Czech Republic 18 42 2,333 5 Italy 16 37 2,312 6 Spain 16 37 2,312 7 England 16 37 2,312 8 Turkey 18 40 2,222 9 Netherlands 18 39 2,166 10 Croatia 16 34 2,125 11 Belgium 16 33 2,062 12 Russia 18 37 2,055 13 Denmark 18 37 2,055 14 Ireland 18 35 1,944 15 Poland 18 34 1,888 16 Slovenia 18 34 1,888 17 Bulgaria 18 34 1,888 18 Romania 16 30 1,875 19 Scotland 16 29 1,812 20 Serbia & Mont. 18 31 1,722 21 Switzerland 18 29 1,611 22 Greece 16 25 1,562 23 Austria 16 24 1,500 24 Slovakia 18 27 1,500 25 Ukraine 18 27 1,500 26 Iceland 18 26 1,444 27 Finland 16 22 1,375 28 Norway 18 24 1,333 29 Israel 16 21 1,312 30 Bosnia-Herz. 16 21 1,312 31 Latvia 16 20 1,250 32 Wales 18 22 1,222 33 Hungary 16 19 1,187 34 Georgia 16 17 1,062 35 Belarus 18 18 1,000 36 Cyprus 18 16 0,888 37 Estonia 18 16 0,888 38 North. Ireland 18 14 0,777 39 Lithuania 16 12 0,750 40 Macedonia 18 13 0,722 41 Albania 16 11 0,687 42 Moldova 18 12 0,666 43 Armenia 18 12 0,666 44 Azerbaijan 18 9 0,500 45 Faroe Islands 18 8 0,444 46 Malta 18 2 0,111 47 San Marino 16 1 0,062 48 Liechtenstein 16 1 0,062 49 Andorra 18 0 0,000 50 Kazakhstan 0 0 0,000 51 Luxembourg 18 0 0,000 (Germany 16 35 2,187) Rankings 2002 and 2000 will follow this evening, afaik this system wasn't used before. |
Author: Osiris
Date: 13-10-2005, 09:29
| nitsansh, thanks a lot for my favorite topic. Draw your kind attention to a minor mistake: Slovakia has 1,650 (33:20) instead of 1,750 as it is stated in your table but still in Pot C. |
Author: Ricardo
Date: 13-10-2005, 09:40
| yes, your order is ok, but the coefficients are not: Poland has 2.056, not 2.176. Slovakia has 1.650 not 1.750 Hungary 1.389 Finland 1.300 Belarus/Armenia order should be changed(coeff. are right!)
The rest I have the same (I don't say that's correct, but...)
This could lead to 'intersting' unbalanced groups! Let's say Greece, Romania, Bulgaria could be in 1 group!! Or Netherlands, Spain, Serbia. I think any team from pot 4 that at least is qualified for play-offs is in a dangerous group:Serbia, Norway, Ukraine, Slovakia. |
Author: Forza-AZ
Date: 13-10-2005, 15:21
| @flob
I have exactly the same coefficients as you.
You only have 2 times 2 teams in the wrong order. Portugal and England have the same overall and WC06 coefficient, but Portugal has the far better avarage GD (2,500 versus 1,167). Same for Luxembourg and San Marino, Luxembourg has a better GD (-3,200 versus -3,778).
So San Marino is in "Pot H". UEFA can off course also decide that there will be 8 teams in Pot G. |
Author: Ricardo
Date: 13-10-2005, 15:45
| I think I see it now, flob. Your first entry with the list is correct, the second one has the glitches I named before. |
Author: flob
Date: 13-10-2005, 19:49
| @forza, yes, I had the wrong sorting order for the goal difference, England/Portugal and San Marino/Luxembourg change places.
@ricardo, I think the 2nd post you are referring to is that one from nitsansh not from me... |
Author: nitsansh
Date: 14-10-2005, 05:57
Edited by: nitsansh at: 14-10-2005, 18:59 | OK, here is (hopefully) the correct ranking:
Standings after matches of Oct 12: Association '06 Points Matches Coeff. total 14 Greece 1,750 39 20 1,950 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 Netherlands 2,667 51 20 2,550 2 England 2,500 45 18 2,500 3 Portugal 2,500 30 12 2,500 4 Czech Republic 2,250 49 20 2,450 5 France 2,000 44 18 2,445 6 Sweden 2,400 41 18 2,278 ----------------------------------------------------- 7 Germany 0,000 18 8 2,250 8 Croatia 2,400 40 18 2,222 9 Italy 2,300 40 18 2,222 10 Turkey 1,917 42 20 2,100 11 Poland 2,400 37 18 2,056 12 Spain 2,000 37 18 2,056 13 Romania 2,083 39 20 1,950 ----------------------------------------------------- 15 Serbia & Mont. 2,200 34 18 1,889 16 Russia 1,917 37 20 1,850 17 Denmark 1,833 37 20 1,850 Switzerland 1,800 33 18 1,833 18 Norway 1,800 32 18 1,778 19 Bulgaria 1,500 32 18 1,778 20 Ukraine 2,083 35 20 1,750 21 Slovakia 1,917 33 20 1,650 ----------------------------------------------------- 22 Bosnia-Herz. 1,600 29 18 1,611 23 Ireland 1,700 28 18 1,556 24 Belgium 1,200 28 18 1,556 25 Latvia 1,250 31 20 1,550 26 Israel 1,800 27 18 1,500 27 Scotland 1,300 27 18 1,500 28 Slovenia 1,200 26 18 1,445 ----------------------------------------------------- 29 Hungary 1,400 25 18 1,389 Austria 1,500 24 18 1,333 30 Finland 1,333 26 20 1,300 31 Estonia 1,417 25 20 1,250 32 Wales 0,800 21 18 1,167 33 Lithuania 1,000 20 18 1,111 34 Albania 1,083 21 20 1,050 35 Iceland 0,400 17 18 0,945 ----------------------------------------------------- 36 Georgia 0,833 17 20 0,850 37 Macedonia 0,750 15 20 0,750 38 Belarus 1,000 13 18 0,722 39 Armenia 0,583 14 20 0,700 40 North. Ireland 0,900 12 18 0,667 41 Cyprus 0,400 12 18 0,667 42 Moldova 0,500 11 18 0,611 ----------------------------------------------------- 43 Liechtenstein 0,667 9 20 0,450 44 Azerbaijan 0,300 7 18 0,389 45 Andorra 0,417 5 20 0,250 46 Malta 0,300 4 18 0,222 47 Faroe Islands 0,111 2 18 0,111 48 Kazakhstan 0,083 1 12 0,083 49 Luxembourg 0,000 0 20 0,000 50 San Marino 0,000 0 18 0,000 |
Author: nitsansh
Date: 14-10-2005, 06:04
| Did you notice that the ranking system favours teams in larger groups?
If you deduct the points they scored against the 7th place teams in their groups, then Romania should be in pot 3 and Serbia in pot 2, Slovakia in pot 4 and Bosnia in pot 3, Latvia in pot 5 and Hungary in pot 4. |
Author: spoonman
Date: 14-10-2005, 12:21
| UEFA has now announced the official seeding list. |
Author: Michele
Date: 14-10-2005, 12:40
| And it only has 7 pots, so let's assume that any two of the teams in pot 7 may be drawn into the same group. |
Author: anita
Date: 14-10-2005, 13:34
| nitshansh, of course. The 7th teams are (normally)"six-pointers", but as long as the group draw is fair and square, this may/will even out over the years. But is it fair? I sometimes (more and more) get a creepy feeling that a lot (and too much) is decided in forehand in locked rooms by TOF (short for The Old Farts in UEFA/FIFA). |
Author: Forza-AZ
Date: 14-10-2005, 16:48
| @anita
Indeed the system favors teams in larger groups, but on the other hand UEFA always places the "top-countries" in the smaller groups, because their clubteams play more matches in European Cups (bullshit reason off course, but that is another discussion). So that countries get to play less matches, but therefor also have a harder time getting in the top-pot!!! |
Author: nitsansh
Date: 14-10-2005, 18:58
Edited by: nitsansh at: 14-10-2005, 19:00 | @Forza
As far as I know, only in the latest WCQ draw the big countries were prevented from being drawn into the big groups. In previous tournaments this wasn't an issue because the largest groups contained 6 teams. |
Author: nitsansh
Date: 14-10-2005, 19:08
| Actually, if I recall correctly, in WCQ1994 there was one group of 7 teams, while one group was left with 5 teams after the suspension of Yugoslavia at the height of the Balkan wars. |
Author: Forza-AZ
Date: 14-10-2005, 19:51
| @nitsansh
I thought that it also was the case in earlier draws. For the World Cup 2002 also the "big 5" were in groups of 5 teams and not in one of the 5 groups with 6 teams.
For Euro 2000 this wasn't the case, but the last 3 qualifying campaign it was (allthough for Euro 2004 all groups were the same size, so it didn't matter). I'm not seeing a rule as yet, but I doubt very much that the "big 5" will be in the only group with 8 teams for Euro 2008. |
Author: Gabi
Date: 16-10-2005, 13:45
| Please go to this link http://xulescu.freefronthost.com/EURO2008_seeding.xls of an excel sheet i've made and please tell me why the coefficients aren't correct. i just can't figure it out! |
Author: alono
Date: 16-10-2005, 14:27
Edited by: alono at: 16-10-2005, 14:34 | To Gabi:
Your calculation of coefficient is wrong. You made it as: {(a/b)+(c/d)}/2 = a/2b + c/2d while it is actually: {(a+c)/(b+d)} = a/(b+d) + c/(b+d)
a,c = number of points b,d = number of matches
The equality 'a/2b + c/2d = a/(b+d) + c/(b+d)' is true only when b=d, and this is not the case...
Israel, for example, have 27 points in 18 games, 9 in 8 games of euro-04 and 18 in 10 games of mondial-06, so coefficient is 27/18 = 1.5. In your calculation it is (9/8 + 18/10)/2 = something different... |
Author: Gabi
Date: 16-10-2005, 16:43
| thanx. i took the formula from a romanian sport newspaper. aparently it was wrong. |
Author: Edgar
Date: 17-10-2005, 07:55
| GSP, isn't it? They never get the coefficients right. Check out this Romanian forum (link) and you'll find the info you need. |
Author: Edgar
Date: 01-11-2005, 10:53
| EURO 2008 full match schedule -> pdf file |
Author: MartinW
Date: 02-11-2005, 10:23
| I notice that the quarter finals are: 1: Winner A v Runner-up B 2: Winner B v Runner-up A 3: Winner C v Runner-up D 4: Winner D v Runner-up C
But then the semi finals are 1 v 2 and 3 v 4. This means there is a very high chance that two teams qualifying from the same group will meet again at the semi final stage. I thought that previously this was avoided by making the semi finals 1 v 3 and 2 v 4. Then teams from the same group cannot meet again until the final.
Do you think it is a mistake or done deliberately? Anyone have an idea why? |
Author: svinassa
Date: 02-11-2005, 11:52
| At least we are certain to avoid the nightmarish final between Switzerland and Austria :p |
Author: FrancoisD
Date: 02-11-2005, 13:38
| Remember world cup 2002 : the scheme is dependent on the duo-organization. I suspect that until the final, a country will play only in one country, not in Austria, then Switzerland, then Austria... |
Author: Forza-AZ
Date: 02-11-2005, 20:06
Edited by: Forza-AZ at: 02-11-2005, 20:10 | @FrancoisD
That would have been a logical thing if indeed the matches would have been split that way. But groups A and C play in Switzerland and groups B and D in Austria, and still they meet each other in the QF's.
So in this schedule the following teams have to move to the other country:
-All runners-up of the groups -winner of QF's 1B-2A and 1C-2D -winner of semifinal 1A/2B-1B/2A
So that's not the explanation in this case, as it indeed was for WC 2002. |
|
|