|
|
This forum is read-only now. Please use Forum 2 for new posts
| xml |
No replies possible in the archive |
|
Author: Sasa
Date: 21-09-2003, 14:18
| How realistic is ranking of clubs by IFFHS?
http://www.iffhs.de/ |
|
Author: Shanes
Date: 21-09-2003, 23:33
| Celtic is not the second best team in the world, Anderlecht isn't better than every German team and neither is PSG.
The ranking has to be a joke. |
|
Author: pollymac
Date: 23-09-2003, 17:58
| The rankings system is a bit (well a big bit flawed) in that it awards points for CL qualifiers (of which Celtic won 4 matches). In most ranking systems their will always be obvious anomaly's, this I believe is one of them. |
|
Author: Adam
Date: 25-09-2003, 15:37
| The IFFHS rankings are a load of old twaddle. I support Celtic but they are not in the top 10 in the world. |
|
Author: molosztash
Date: 31-10-2003, 13:25
| I think IFFHS standings are very logic, and reliable. UEFA ratings are better to decide the seedings but, if you look at the 2007 club standings, you will see that, IFFHS and UEFA are getting closer. Because it is the only list UEFA takes into account and consists of results of only last year... |
|
Author: bomber
Date: 01-11-2003, 12:37
| here is my ranking of all rankings :
1.the ranking of the european football teams ( http://www.eurotopfoot.com )
2.http://sathanasias.bravepages.com/f-teams/ft-trank-all.html its a all time ranking
3.http://www.histora.org/
now you can laugh !
4.esm ranking ( you can find it on www.kicker.de )
5.iffhs
6.computer tabelle ( also on www.kicker.de )
7.EFS http://european-football-statistics.co.uk/ecr/ecr01-04.htm |
|
|